Imagine this head line in the New York Times: Palestinian shot dead an Israeli and wound his son! Now imagine this in great big bold letters. Pretty common title, don’t you agree?
Well how about “Israeli settlers opened fire on a man and his son“?
And if this doesn’t convince you that the two-party system is up just for the show, I don’t know what will.
And yet another, what appears to be a hoax unrolls in England. Let’s see how many “strong” words they use:
thought
believed
“confident”
thought to have involved
“of some kind”
2x believe
understood to be
suspected
“interesting items”
“mass murder on an unimaginable scale”.
Check the news - wait for the country of Lebanon.
In more pleasing, yet disturbing news, US lags behind grasp of evolution and genetics. Fox “News” reports another side.
“A better explanation for the high percentage of doubters of Darwinism in America may be that this country’s citizens are famously independent and are not given to being rolled by an ideological elite in any field,”
… only on Fox.
Another here’s what I call a stupid lapsus, this time from England.
See what they have to say about some mussels developing thicker shells in response to a newly introduced crab species. This is what they have to say:
“We wanted to know, how is it that these mollusks can recognize a crab that is historically not present in North America?” Freeman said.
Evolution doesn’t work that way. Animals don’t actively fight the threat. Instead, they develop, through mutation or alternative molecule signaling, another trait, in this case, a thicker shell that prevents crabs from crushing it to smithereen. Some other mussel may develop a mounted minigun on their mantle, which would help them survive. Others would build another mechanism that would not help them fight this predator. What is left to do is that mussels “prove” that their new mechanism works. And 15 years is probably more than enough for the crabs to weed out thin shelled mussels and leave thick shelled ones intact. It’s called natural selection.
And they obviously know that:
The mussel’s inducible response to H. sanguineus reflects natural selection favoring the recognition of this novel predator through rapid evolution of cue specificity or thresholds
BUT, they go on:
The mussels most likely evolved quickly because they are used to being prey to many species in these waters.
Here’s another no brainer example of how natural selection works. If you don’t swim, you sink. Simple as that.
It would seem roofies are quite the nuisance in Greece.
Urchins are dying along the West US coast. Not good.
And here’s a history story. History is, next to biology, my second sweetheart.
The lack of police patrols and maximum-security penitentiaries didn’t translate into a lawless society, however. Murder rates per capita in 14th-century England were a fifth that of Washington D.C. in the 1990s, according to estimates by the British government.
Ok, I’m beginning to foam. I’m outta here.